ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Vaccination Coverage in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies to identify the facilitators and barriers of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage in India, along with exploring the beliefs and practices regarding vaccination. The focus was on interventions targeting beneficiaries, healthcare providers, and the health system via recipient-focused methods, provider-oriented training, and health system reforms to increase vaccination coverage. Search terms were adapted from database scoping and title, abstract, and index term analysis, and a thorough literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Crossref databases for studies published in English on the topic of research between January 2013 and December 2024. Among the 12 articles selected for the study, four were mixed-method studies, and five were conducted among stakeholders in the community providing the vaccination. The quantitative synthesis revealed several key themes: beneficiary-related (improved vaccine acceptance), community-related (mobilization, awareness, ownership, and leadership), and healthcare provider-related (better stock management, endorsement, and engagement). Additional themes included local advocacy and the integration of family planning with infant vaccination. Barriers were categorized as system-related (e.g., accessibility issues, coercive strategies), information-related (misinformation, lack of awareness), and logistic-related (limited resources, indirect costs). Effective interventions were found to leverage community engagement, improve healthcare provider practices, and enhance vaccine acceptance among beneficiaries. However, significant barriers persist, including systemic challenges, information gaps, and logistical constraints. Social norms, health attitudes, and trust in healthcare systems have emerged as critical factors affecting vaccination uptake. These findings underscore the need for multifaceted, culturally sensitive approaches to improve vaccine coverage in India. Future interventions should address identified barriers while building upon successful strategies to ensure more comprehensive and sustainable vaccination programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.