ArticleCureus2025
Routine Pharmacological Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis in Lower-Limb Injuries: A Three-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study and Service Evaluation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Lower-limb injury and immobilisation substantially increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study assessed outcomes following the introduction of routine pharmacological VTE prophylaxis for patients with lower-limb injuries at a UK teaching hospital. Aim The aim of the study is to evaluate three years of routine VTE prophylaxis in lower-limb injuries, focusing on inpatient thromboembolic events, bleeding outcomes, and prescribing patterns. Methods This retrospective study reviewed consecutive patients with lower-limb injuries managed in a single UK teaching trust following the introduction of routine pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. Data were extracted from the hospital's Prescribing Information and Communication System (PICS) covering the period 2022-2024. Data represented all lower-limb injury admissions over a three-year period rather than longitudinal follow-up of individual patients. The primary outcomes were symptomatic VTE events (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)) during hospitalisation, recorded bleeding episodes during hospitalisation, and prescribing patterns of prophylaxis agents. Results A total of 4,011 patients were included (mean age 53.4 ± 21.1 years, and 54.6% were women). Enoxaparin was the predominant prophylactic agent (86.5%), followed by apixaban (5.9%). Bleeding-related entries were identified in 36.0% of patients. No DVT cases were identified, and one PE was recorded during the three-year study period. Conclusion Routine VTE prophylaxis, predominantly low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)-based with limited direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use, appears effective in substantially reducing thromboembolic events in lower-limb injuries, though inpatient bleeding entries were common but ungraded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.