Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426803›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Early Intervention as a Way of Reducing Neurocognitive Delay in Pediatric Sickle Cell Patients.

London Wilson, Suzanne I Riskin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

London WilsonDepartment of Foundational Sciences, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.
Suzanne I RiskinDepartment of Foundational Sciences, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic blood disorder that largely affects African Americans in the United States. This disease leads to an increased risk of neurocognitive decline and delay in pediatric patients with or without cerebral events. Despite its proven benefits, early intervention (EI) is underutilized in this population. This review aims to investigate the use of specific EI services within the pediatric SCD population and whether any combination of these services can lead to a better outcome than others. A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The methods involved a systematic search using Boolean-modifier terms related to sickle cell and neurocognitive delay, with inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to select 19 relevant pediatric-focused articles, guided by PRISMA methodology. Results found that the use of EI services has proven to be beneficial in this population. Further research is needed to investigate EI services, such as the use of these therapies for preventative measures prior to symptoms or diagnosis of neurocognitive delay, and whether the starting age could affect the neurocognitive outcomes of the patients.

Indexed as

developmental delayearly interventionearly intervention servicesneurocognitive delayoccupational therapypediatricphysical therapysickle cell anemia in childrensickle cell diseasespeech therapy

Identifiers

PMID41426803
PMCPMC12715976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.