ReviewCureus2025
Early Intervention as a Way of Reducing Neurocognitive Delay in Pediatric Sickle Cell Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic blood disorder that largely affects African Americans in the United States. This disease leads to an increased risk of neurocognitive decline and delay in pediatric patients with or without cerebral events. Despite its proven benefits, early intervention (EI) is underutilized in this population. This review aims to investigate the use of specific EI services within the pediatric SCD population and whether any combination of these services can lead to a better outcome than others. A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The methods involved a systematic search using Boolean-modifier terms related to sickle cell and neurocognitive delay, with inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to select 19 relevant pediatric-focused articles, guided by PRISMA methodology. Results found that the use of EI services has proven to be beneficial in this population. Further research is needed to investigate EI services, such as the use of these therapies for preventative measures prior to symptoms or diagnosis of neurocognitive delay, and whether the starting age could affect the neurocognitive outcomes of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.