ReviewCureus2025
Neoadjuvant Therapy to Enable Partial Nephrectomy in Patients With High-Complexity or Locally Advanced Non-metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant therapies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: review of current evidence and future applications.World journal of urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in enabling partial nephrectomy (PN) for patients with high-complexity or locally advanced non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thirteen studies, including 359 patients, were analysed, with most investigating vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs), while some assessed immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) alone or in combination. The pooled results showed that neoadjuvant therapy increased the feasibility of PN, achieving high rates of tumour shrinkage and negative surgical margins. Perioperative outcomes, including blood loss and complications, were comparable to upfront surgery, and severe complications were uncommon. Renal function generally declined following treatment, but nephron-sparing approaches preserved kidney function better than radical surgery. Early survival outcomes, including recurrence-free and overall survival, were favourable across studies. These findings suggest that neoadjuvant therapy may be a safe and effective strategy to expand surgical options in complex renal tumours. However, larger prospective trials are needed to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.