ArticleCureus2025
The Epidemiology of US Upper Extremity Amputations: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Database (1990-2019).
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Upper extremity amputations (UEAs) are medically, psychologically, and functionally devastating. This study aimed to evaluate region- and sex-specific differences in unilateral and bilateral upper extremity amputations in the United States (US) from 1990 to 2019. Methods The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database was used to analyze years lived with disability (YLDs), prevalence, and incidence rates per 100,000 people for upper extremity amputations in the US from 1990 to 2019. Data were stratified into four US Census Bureau-defined regions: Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Differences between regions and sexes were assessed, with statistical significance defined as p<0.05. Results Between 1990 and 2019, unilateral upper extremity amputations in the US showed a 34.51% decrease in YLDs, 34.34% in prevalence, and 37.38% in incidence. Bilateral amputations decreased by 51.32%, 48.94%, and 56.80%, respectively. Men consistently had higher YLDs, prevalence, and incidence rates for unilateral amputations (p<0.001). Regionally, the Northeast had the highest mean YLDs, prevalence, and incidence, while the South had the lowest. Men also experienced significantly higher rates of both unilateral and bilateral amputations across all regions compared to women (p<0.05). Conclusions From 1990 to 2019, the US experienced declines in YLDs, prevalence, and incidence of upper extremity amputations. Men had higher rates than women across all regions. The Northeast exhibited the highest rates, while the South had the lowest. These findings underscore notable gender and regional disparities in upper extremity amputation trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.