ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Pleural Vents Inserted by Radiologists Versus Intercostal Chest Drains Managed by Respiratory Physicians for Post-CT-Guided Lung Biopsy Pneumothorax at Glan Clwyd Hospital, Wales.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction CT-guided biopsy (CTGB) of the lung is a commonly performed, minimally invasive procedure used to obtain tissue samples from suspected malignant lung lesions. Pneumothorax is a recognised complication of CTGB. Management typically involves observation, intercostal chest drain insertion, or pleural vent placement. Traditional intercostal chest drains often require unplanned hospital admission, whereas pleural vents allow patient mobility and may reduce inpatient care. Objective The primary aim of this study was to compare hospital length of stay in patients managed with pleural vents inserted by radiologists versus intercostal chest drains managed by respiratory physicians for post-CTGB pneumothorax. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 98 scheduled CT-guided biopsies performed over a one-year period at Glan Clwyd Hospital, Wales. Seventeen cases were excluded due to lesion resolution, procedure abandonment, biopsies outside the lungs, medically unfit for biopsy, or inaccessible biopsy sites, leaving 81 biopsies for analysis. Results Among the 81 patients, 39 experienced complications, including 30 pneumothoraces and nine haemothoraces. Nine patients with pneumothorax required intervention: four were managed with pleural vents inserted by the operating radiologist, and five received intercostal chest drains inserted by the respiratory team. The modal length of stay was one day for pleural vent patients and three days for chest drain patients. Conclusion Pleural vents were associated with a shorter modal length of hospital stay (one day) compared with intercostal chest drains (three days) for post-CTGB pneumothorax. Whilst limited by its single-centred, observational nature, this study provides useful real-world insight into current pneumothorax management by radiologists and respiratory physicians. Further prospective multicentre research is needed to validate the potential advantage of pleural vents over intercostal chest drains and support the development of standardised protocols and potential outpatient pathways for CTGB pneumothorax management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.