ArticleJournal of public health research2025
Estimating pathways affecting stunting in families with children under aged 5 years.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stunting is a condition of impaired growth and development that affects children worldwide. It impacts not only physical growth but also cognitive development and learning capacity. This study aimed to identify factors associated with stunting among families with children aged 5 years. Design and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to May 2023. Secondary data from the National Population and Family Planning Board. This study involved 2,014,369 children under 5 years old. The endogenous variables were poor housing condition and stunting, while the exogenous ones lacked access to clean water supply, inadequate toilet, maternal age, short birth intervals, high parity, and lower education. The data were analyzed using path analysis with IBM SPSS AMOS 22. Result: The path model showed goodness of fit with CMIN = 0.98, NFI = 0.99, CFI = 1.00, and RMSEA = 0.00. Poor housing conditions had a direct and statistically significant effect on stunting ( Conclusions: Poor housing conditions, maternal age, and lower education had a direct effect on stunting. High parity, lack of access to clean water supply, lower education, and short birth intervals had an indirect effect on stunting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.