ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
How supernatural and scientific beliefs influence individual cancer prevention behaviors: an empirical study of young Chinese adults.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The global increase in the incidence of early-onset cancer underscores the urgent need to understand the behavioral determinants of prevention effectiveness. This study aimed to examine the fundamental roles of supernatural and scientific beliefs in shaping health-related cognitions and their potentially conflicting influences on cancer prevention behaviors. Methods: Based on health locus of control (HLOC) theory, a dual-pathway attitudinal model was developed and tested using a two-step procedure to validate the model with data from a national survey ( Results: The results indicated that both supernatural and scientific beliefs significantly predicted cancer control beliefs and prevention behaviors. Specifically, Chinese supernatural beliefs negatively predicted cancer prevention behaviors through cancer fatalism (external HLOC). In contrast, positive scientific attitudes were positively associated with cancer prevention behaviors through cancer controllability (internal HLOC). Furthermore, positive scientific attitudes mitigated the detrimental effects of supernatural beliefs on cancer prevention behaviors by reducing cancer fatalism and strengthening perceived cancer controllability. Discussion: These findings elucidate the underlying factors contributing to both effective and ineffective cancer prevention and identify potential pathways for intervention and education. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.