Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426690›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Ethnic and residential differences in adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and self-reported physical fitness among Zhuang and Han adolescents in southern China.

Hongsheng Qian, Jingwang Tan, Jiaxing Tang, Yu Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongsheng QianSchool of Physical Education, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.
Jingwang TanDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiaxing TangSchool of Physical Education, Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, China.
Yu ZouDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The 24-h movement guidelines integrate physical activity (PA), screen time, and sleep for health benefits, yet little is known about how adherence to these guidelines relates to physical fitness (PF) among adolescents, particularly in the context of ethnic and residential differences. This study examines the independent and combined associations of adhering to the 24-h movement guidelines with self-reported PF among Han and Zhuang adolescents in southern China, while exploring potential differences by residence and ethnicity. Methods: Cross-sectional data from 6,913 adolescents were analyzed using a validated self-reported questionnaire to assess adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines and PF components (cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness, speed/agility, muscular strength, and flexibility). Generalized linear models were used to examine associations. Results: In this sample, only 1.6% of participants met the overall guidelines. Meeting more guidelines was significantly ( Conclusion: Our findings highlight the critical role of adhering to the 24-h movement guidelines, mainly MVPA, in improving self-reported PF among adolescents and underscore the need to address urban-rural disparities in promoting the 24-h movement guidelines.

Indexed as

EthnicityExerciseGuideline AdherencePhysical FitnessResidence CharacteristicsAdolescentChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMaleScreen TimeSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnairesethnicitymovement guidelinesphysical activityphysical fitnessresidencescreen timesleep duration

Identifiers

PMID41426690
PMCPMC12711711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.