Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426630›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Predictors of Wing Attacks by Birds Across Australian Butterflies.

Hansani S S Daluwatta Galappaththige, Donald James McLean, Liisa Hämäläinen, Chathuranga Dharmarathne, Marie E Herberstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hansani S S Daluwatta GalappaththigeSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-6657
Donald James McLeanSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Liisa HämäläinenSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Chathuranga DharmarathneSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Marie E HerbersteinSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predation pressure is a key selective force that shapes anti-predatory traits in prey. The pressure exerted by predation can vary across biomes and different prey communities and depends on prey characteristics, such as prey size and sex. Here, the variation in predation pressure on Australian butterflies was assessed using wing damage caused by avian attacks in over 2310 individuals from five butterfly families. Temperate butterflies were less likely to receive avian attacks compared to subtropical and tropical butterflies. Male butterflies were predicted to suffer more avian attacks than females; however, our results indicated that females were more at risk. We did not find evidence of butterfly size influencing the attack likelihood. According to the regression model, Nymphalids (Browns) were more likely to receive avian attacks than Hesperiids (Skippers). The results provide interesting insights into predator-prey interactions and the factors that impact the risk of predation.

Indexed as

avian attacksbutterfly familiespredation pressuretropicswing damage

Identifiers

PMID41426630
PMCPMC12711438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.