ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Qualitative participatory needs assessment in long-term care facilities: groundwork for a workplace health promotion program based on traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM).
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The workload for nursing staff in long-term care facilities will increase in the coming decades, making initiatives to promote health in the work environment increasingly important. The pilot project "Healthy Care Cares for Health" (HCCH) aims to develop, implement, and evaluate a TCIM-based program for workplace health promotion (WHP) in long-term care facilities. To create an overview of health-related challenges and resources of the pilot facility, a needs assessment (NA) with participatory elements was conducted to include participant input. Methods: The NA was based on the framework of a quality-oriented Rapid Participatory Appraisal (RPA). Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and participant observation. The interview sampling used maximum variation based on participant socio-economic data including occupation, age, and gender ( Results: The NA revealed a complex interplay of health-related resources and challenges. Key challenges included stressors (e.g., insufficient breaks), physical and psychological strain (e.g., emotional stress, physical workload) and unhealthy lifestyle habits, particularly related to eating and exercise. At the same time, staff members demonstrated valuable individual resources and strategies (e.g., trust, a sense of coherence). They also showed approaches related to safety, stress management, workplace relationships, nutrition and physical activity. Notably, some participants already make regular use of TCIM strategies (e.g., breathing exercises). Discussion: The RPA-based NA is an effective, resource-efficient way of exploring target group- and setting-specific data on health-related challenges and potential in long-term care facilities. These results form a crucial basis for a context-adapted WHP program, with TCIM-related resources and strategies guiding the development and implementation of the planned TCIM-based WHP. TCIM approaches offer sustainable, low-threshold, and resource-efficient health promotion measures that can enhance staff health, care quality, and patient safety in long-term care and are also relevant for primary health care professionals broadly. Furthermore, the NA, with its participatory elements based on RPA recommendations, supports continuous target group involvement and provides a basis for consistent nursing staff participation in a WHP program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.