SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Trends in AI-based diagnosis and intervention of metabolic diseases: a bibliometric analysis of the literature from 2000 to 2024.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the global prevalence of metabolic diseases has continued to rise, emerging as a major public health concern worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI), with its advanced capabilities in data analysis, pattern recognition, and predictive reasoning, has demonstrated remarkable potential in enhancing the diagnosis, management, and prevention of metabolic disorders. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the WOSCC and Scopus databases, followed by database merging and deduplication using R scripts, resulting in a final corpus of 1,059 publications for analysis. Bibliometric analysis tools, including VOSviewer and CiteSpace, were subsequently employed to visualize and quantitatively assess the distribution of publications by country and institution, prolific authors, influential journals, citation networks, and emerging research keywords. Results: Research on AI in metabolic diseases has experienced explosive growth, with publication output increasing by 394% over the past 5 years, paralleling the broader expansion of AI technologies. China, the United States, and the United Kingdom have emerged as the leading contributors in this domain, with China contributing the largest share (21.87%), followed by the United States (17.10%). Among high-output institutions, Institutions from China contributed the most publications (298), while Harvard Medical School in the United States demonstrates the strongest academic influence. Nieuwdorp M stands out as the most prolific and highly cited author, with Kupusinac and Aleksandar also recognized for their significant contributions to the field. Scientific Reports ranks as the most productive journal, whereas Atherosclerosis is identified as one of the most authoritative journals among high-output publications. The co-occurrence of keywords such as "machine learning," "deep learning," "data mining," "metabolomics," and "diagnosis" reveals the application of artificial intelligence and advanced data processing techniques in metabolic diseases. Discussion: This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric overview of the evolution and research trends of AI in the diagnosis and intervention of metabolic diseases. The analysis highlights three major research frontiers: AI-assisted prevention using smart devices, multimodal diagnostic approaches, and intervention strategies guided by large language models (LLMs). Overall, the findings offer valuable insights into the ongoing transformation of metabolic disease management through AI technologies and lay the groundwork for future research aimed at advancing intelligent diagnostic and therapeutic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.