Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426570›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Clinical impact of early microchimerism dynamics after transplantation with enhanced dual-conditioning regimen in hematological diseases.

Yan Gu, Shengnan Du, Yilian Yang, Jiahua Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan GuDepartment of Geriatrics, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Shengnan DuDepartment of Hematology, Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Yilian YangDepartment of Hematology, Nanjing Pukou People's Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Jiahua DingDepartment of Hematology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microchimerism dynamics following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) may predict engraftment and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to quantify microchimerism changes and assess their clinical significance. Methods: In this retrospective study, eighteen patients undergoing allo-HSCT received either an enhanced dual-conditioning (EDCT) regimen (fludarabine/busulfan/cytarabine plus cyclophosphamide 200 mg/kg) or a modified EDCT regimen. Microchimerism levels were serially monitored from day +1 post-transplantation. Results: Complete donor chimerism (CDC) was achieved in 16/18 patients (88.9%) at a median time of 14 days (range, 9-24). The median neutrophil and platelet engraftment times were 15 days (range, 11-28) and 25 days (range, 10-80 in 16 patients who had platelet engraftment), respectively. Among them, eight patients retained constant CDC, 3 developed one increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), while 5 had multiple IMCs. Patients with constant CDC demonstrated faster platelet engraftment (median, 19.5 vs. 40 days, Conclusion: Early microchimerism dynamics correlate with engraftment efficiency and survival outcomes in allo-HSCT patients, suggesting its clinical utility for timely intervention and personalized treatment adjustment. The promising long-term outcomes support the applicability of this regimen and monitoring approach across transplantation modalities.

Indexed as

allo-HSCTengraftmentenhanced dual-conditioning regimenmicrochimerismsurvival

Identifiers

PMID41426570
PMCPMC12711499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.