ArticlePulmonary circulation2025
Real-World Dosing and Persistence of Oral Treprostinil Initiation Strategies in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitioning From Oral to Intravenous Treprostinil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Real-World Dosing and Persistence of Oral Treprostinil Initiation Strategies in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), limited real-world data are available on persistence to oral treprostinil therapy, particularly while transitioning from parenteral prostacyclins. We compared persistence to oral treprostinil and total daily dose (TDD) achieved among patients with PAH initiating oral treprostinil de novo or while transitioning from parenteral prostacyclins using two real-world datasets: specialty pharmacy shipment records (Analysis 1) and ADAPT registry (Analysis 2). In Analysis 1, patients receiving oral treprostinil in 2017, 2020, and 2023 were included. In Analysis 2, de-identified data of patients enrolled in ADAPT from July 2017 to January 2022 were included. We conducted descriptive analyses and quantified persistence to oral treprostinil and TDD. In Analysis 1, the proportion of transition patients increased (24%-41%) from 2017 to 2023, whereas the proportion of de novo patients decreased (76%-59%). For the overall population, the mean initial oral treprostinil dose increased over the 3 years (6.0-8.9 mg TDD). The majority (61%) of patients transitioning to oral treprostinil were persistent with therapy at 12 months compared with de novo patients (47%). In Analysis 2, approximately 93% of transition patients and 77% of de novo patients were persistent on oral treprostinil therapy at 12 months. These analyses suggest that patients with PAH are increasingly being initiated on oral treprostinil while transitioning from parenteral prostacyclin rather than initiating de novo. Patients transitioning to oral treprostinil achieved and maintained higher TDD of oral treprostinil and persisted on oral treprostinil therapy longer than de novo patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.