ReviewFrontiers in sleep2023
Phrenic nerve stimulation for treatment of central sleep apnea.
Review in Frontiers in sleep, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intermittent phrenic afferent activation induces phrenic motor plasticity.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of central sleep apnea (CSA) is rare in general population. However, CSA is prevalent in those with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders. CSA may persist or even worsen with positive airway pressure therapy in some patients and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) offers an alternative treatment for patients with CSA. The device is implanted similar to a cardiac pacemaker and typically followed in the sleep clinic. Multiple studies have described the efficacy and safety of PNS. Improvements were seen in apnea hypopnea events, central events, arousals, and daytime sleepiness and maintained through 5 years. Safety demonstrated a 91% freedom from serious adverse events through 1 year. The physiologic approach and improvement in sleep metrics and quality of life with a strong safety profile make this therapy a good option for many patients with central sleep apnea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.