Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426432›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Modality-specific sustained attention deficits in aphasia: task performance and lesion analysis.

Svetlana V Kuptsova, Arianna N LaCroix, Oleg V Nikolsky, Marianna A Grigorian, Alexey G Petryshevskii, Maria V Ivanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Svetlana V KuptsovaDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-2824
Arianna N LaCroixDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Oleg V NikolskySchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4975-0264
Marianna A GrigorianDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation, Moscow 109240, Russia.
Alexey G PetryshevskiiDepartment of Radiology, Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation, Moscow 109240, Russia.
Maria V IvanovaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Funding

Exercising language: Behavioral and neurophysiological changes after high-intensity exercise training in post-stroke aphasiaR01DC022663 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Maria V. Ivanova · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
Exercising language: Behavioral and neurophysiological changes after high-intensity exercise training in post-stroke aphasia.R56DC020700 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVANOVA, MARIA V. · 2023 to 2023
$713k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC022663NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC020700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with aphasia experience cognitive deficits in addition to their well-documented language impairments, with attention being a frequently affected domain. While numerous studies highlight the impact of attention deficits on language abilities in people with aphasia, research examining the neural correlates of these deficits and the influence of stimulus modality on attention performance remains limited. In this cross-sectional study, in Experiment 1, we investigated sustained attention deficits in people with aphasia using four matched tasks that varied by modality (visual versus auditory) and linguistic content (verbal versus non-verbal). In Experiment 2, we further explored whether the neural resources supporting sustained attention differ by modality. Participants included 56 people with aphasia following left-hemisphere stroke (Experiments 1 and 2), 14 individuals after right-hemisphere stroke and 23 age-matched healthy controls (only Experiment 1). Participants completed four sustained attention tasks. Structural MRI scans were obtained for stroke participants, and neural correlates of attention were explored in people with aphasia. Behavioural analyses revealed that people with aphasia, as a group and across subtypes, performed significantly worse on auditory tasks with notably slower reaction times compared to healthy controls, indicating sustained attention deficits, particularly in the auditory modality. Compared to individuals with right-hemisphere stroke, people with aphasia made significantly more errors only on the auditory verbal task, which may reflect the combined impact of language impairment and attentional demands. No significant differences were observed between non-fluent and fluent aphasia subtypes, indicating comparable sustained attention deficits across these groups. However, participants with non-fluent aphasia demonstrated slower reaction times across nearly all tasks compared to healthy individuals, while those with fluent aphasia showed slower reaction times only in the auditory modality. Lesion-symptom mapping analysis did not reveal distinct brain-behaviour associations specific to the auditory modality. However, for the visual verbal task, poorer performance was associated with lesions in the inferior and middle frontal gyri and underlying white matter fasciculi (inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus and corpus callosum), regions implicated in written word comprehension. Taken together, these findings suggest that people with aphasia exhibit modality-specific sustained attention deficits, particularly in the auditory domain, likely reflecting impaired processing of auditory information.

Indexed as

aphasiamodality specificitysustained attentionVLSM

Identifiers

PMID41426432
PMCPMC12715772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.