ArticleBrain communications2025
The role of disease-associated short tandem repeats in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational Short Tandem Repeat Genotyping Reveals Clinically Relevant Expansions in a Large Turkish Neurodegeneration Disease Cohort.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short tandem repeats (STRs) are recognized contributors to various neurodegenerative disorders, with evidence supporting genetic pleiotropy among these STRs. Multiple STRs have been associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), although the strength of evidence supporting each association varies. To establish the role of disease-associated repeat expansions as pleiotropic risk factors in ALS susceptibility and progression, we genotyped a panel of 39 STRs, known to cause neurological diseases, within Project MinE in 6519 patients and 2412 controls, utilizing 100 and 150 bp short-read sequencing technology. Pathogenic allele frequencies were compared to those in a control cohort comprising 4930 Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) genomes. Repeat sizes and motif changes were detected using ExpansionHunter and ExpansionHunter Denovo. We developed a model to predict genotyping failures in STRs and established a best-practice protocol for assessing the accuracy of STR genotyping in short-read sequencing data. Following our genotyping assessment, 11 out of the 39 STRs exhibited insufficient genotyping accuracy, warranting caution in studying these STRs using these tools in combination with short-read sequencing. Furthermore, the observed differences in STR genotyping accuracy across studies applying different sequencing technologies and genotyping tools in control cohorts highlight the importance of a carefully designed experimental setup when interpreting potential disease-associated STR findings. Pathogenic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.