Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426423›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

A horizon scan of music therapy in education.

Yifei Lyu, Xiangyu Wang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yifei LyuSchool of Music, Baotou Teachers' College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China.
Xiangyu WangSchool of Architecture and Art Design, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Music therapy has gained increasing recognition for its benefits in educational settings, particularly in supporting students with diverse learning needs and promoting overall well-being. However, existing reviews reveal several limitations, including fragmented research efforts, limited interdisciplinary and international collaboration, and practical constraints such as insufficient funding and a shortage of trained music therapists. These gaps highlight the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the field's development. Methods: This research systematically examined publication trends, key contributors, and thematic clusters in the field of music therapy in education. Both quantitative indicators (e.g., publication and citation patterns) and qualitative thematic analysis were employed to generate an integrated overview of current research dynamics. Results: The analysis revealed a strong increase in publications and citations, largely driven by Western institutions. Despite this growth, several persistent challenges were identified: research fragmentation, limited international collaboration, and a notable underrepresentation of studies focusing on media-related aspects of music therapy. Discussion: The study recommends strengthening interdisciplinary and international research networks, expanding investigations into media-related practices, developing standardized assessment tools, and increasing support in terms of funding and professional development. These recommendations provide a strategic roadmap for advancing music therapy in educational contexts and offer actionable guidance for researchers, educators, and policymakers aiming to enhance its integration and effectiveness.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysiscontent analysisemotional well-beingmusic educationmusic therapy

Identifiers

PMID41426423
PMCPMC12715936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.