Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426414›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Perceived temporal distortions may explain the effect of precarity on intertemporal choices.

Arjun Mitra, Nisheeth Srivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arjun MitraDepartment of Cognitive Science, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.
Nisheeth SrivastavaDepartment of Cognitive Science, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing research on how environmental volatility affect preferences suggests that preference for delayed rewards reduces in the presence of adverse shocks. Researchers typically use reward discounting frameworks to explain these shifts in temporal preferences as shifts in discount rates. In this manuscript, we reinterpret these preference shifts as changes in perceived time duration. Using data from multiple studies, we found that decreases in choice probability for delayed rewards correspond to increases in perceived delay duration, while keeping discount rates constant. Our empirical study also showed that individuals who experienced extension of perceived time during volatility preferred short-term plans more. Based on these findings, we suggest the necessity of considering perceived temporal distortions to understand preference shifts when one encounters environmental volatility.

Indexed as

delay discountinginter-temporal choicessubjective timetime distortionstime preferenceunpredictability

Identifiers

PMID41426414
PMCPMC12715940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.