ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Factors influencing learners learning interest when using AI chatbots-assisted math leaning in higher education.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring College Students' AI Dependence in Human-AI Collaborative Creation: Development and Validation of the CC-PACE Model.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Design and application of a web-based intelligent ophthalmic image analysis teaching platform.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates the determinants of undergraduate learners' interest in AI-supported mathematics education. Drawing upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Social Cognitive Theory, a structural model was proposed and empirically tested, incorporating mathematics anxiety, self-efficacy, performance expectancy, and effort expectancy. Methods: Data were collected from 247 Chinese undergraduates and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results: The findings indicate that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and self-efficacy are significant predictors of learning interest, with effort expectancy exerting the strongest influence. Self-efficacy also indirectly affects learning interest through its influence on perceptions of the system's usefulness and ease of use. Contrary to prior research, mathematics anxiety did not significantly predict either self-efficacy or learning interest, suggesting that AI-facilitated environments may buffer negative emotional effects. Academic major moderated the relationship between mathematics anxiety and learning interest, reflecting disciplinary differences in motivational dynamics. Discussion: This research contributes to theory by integrating motivational constructs into technology acceptance models and extending AI applications to cognitively demanding domains. Practical implications include prioritizing user-centered design and targeted self-efficacy interventions to enhance learner engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.