ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Analysis of classroom silence behaviors among Chinese and Korean undergraduates.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autonomy-supportive teaching, positive academic emotions, and agentic engagement in EFL contexts.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Beyond anxiety and face: strategic silence as instrumental disengagement in a Chinese graduate EAP Reading classroom.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates classroom silence among Chinese and Korean undergraduates using an integrated cultural-psychological model. Drawing on Hofstede's cultural dimensions, Cramer's defense mechanism theory, and Fredricks' engagement framework, classroom silence is conceptualized as both a culturally adaptive practice and a psychologically mediated form of participation. Methods: Survey data from 913 Chinese and 189 Korean students were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), structural equation modeling (SEM), and multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) modeling to validate the measurement structure, evaluate the hypothesized relationships, and assess demographic influences. Results: Speaking anxiety and contextual rigidity emerged as the strongest positive predictors of classroom silence, whereas self-efficacy had the strongest negative effect and served as a key mediator linking environmental and peer factors to silence. Cross-cultural comparisons showed that Chinese students' silence was primarily shaped by hierarchical, teacher-centered classroom structures, whereas Korean students' silence was more influenced by gender norms and peer-group expectations. The interaction between self-efficacy and contextual constraints was significant only among Chinese students, indicating cultural variation in coping responses. Discussion: These findings extend cultural and engagement theories by demonstrating that classroom silence functions as a regulated participation strategy rather than mere disengagement. Pedagogically, the results highlight the importance of fostering students' expressive self-efficacy, reducing excessive teacher authority, and promoting supportive peer environments. Limitations include the cross-sectional design and unequal group sizes. Longitudinal or mixed-methods research is recommended to examine the developmental pathways of classroom silence across cultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.