ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Personal and institutional factors as determinants of civic engagement among university students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cultural heritage education and civic engagement: a value-socialization model among Chinese university students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The study evaluated the civic engagement model within a specific Pakistani cultural context. This study aims to examine the personal and institutional factors, contributing to civic engagement behaviors. Method: The purposive sample consisted of 307 university students aged between 18 and 26 years from the University of Sargodha. The reliability of all the scales used in this study was above 0.70. Results: The results supported the proposed model, indicating that institutional efficacy and sense of student control significantly contribute to explaining civic engagement that includes advocacy, direct action, and organizational participation. The results provide valuable insights into the relationships among attitudinal factors, civic engagement behaviors, and the influence of gender within our cultural context. The strength of the association between variables is shown by the standardized path coefficients ( Conclusion: The study found that institutional efficacy and student control significantly influence advocacy, direct action, and organizational participation that define civic engagement, thus supporting the existing civic engagement model. The study extended the civic engagement model to incorporate mediation effects and investigated it in a specific cultural setting, which can be very useful for educators, lawmakers, and community organizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.