ArticlePediatric investigation2025
The utility of C-reactive protein in neonatal early-onset sepsis screening: A territory-wide cohort analysis.
Article in Pediatric investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-throughput analysis of multimodal monitoring data: the role of machine learning in early warning systems for high-risk neonates.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Review
- Utility of biomarkers in VLBW sepsis evaluations: the implementation gap.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Exploratory Analysis of TLR2, TLR4, Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 10 Gene Polymorphisms in Relation to Clinical Early-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Neonates: A Single-Center Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The utility of C-reactive protein in neonatal early-onset sepsis screening: A territory-wide cohort analysis.Pediatric investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a commonly used biomarker for sepsis. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate CRP's diagnostic performance to detect neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS), while accounting for both gestational and postnatal age. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of neonates born from January 2006 to December 2017 in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Neonates who had CRP tested within 72 h of birth, prior to antibiotics initiation, were included. CRP values were analyzed by gestational age and time after birth. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios (LRs). Results: Among 100 327 tested neonates, 448 developed culture-confirmed EOS, and 34 had meningitis. In uninfected neonates, CRP concentrations rose naturally after 8 h of life, peaking at 24-32 h, with higher values in term neonates at 24-48 h (median 6.2 mg/L, interquartile range 2.9-14.3). Diagnostic performance was better in preterm neonates (e.g., the area under the ROC curve after 4 h of life: 0.88 in <34 weeks, 0.83-0.92 in 34-36 weeks, and 0.73-0.77 in term neonates). Sensitivity within the first 4 h was low across all groups. LRs increased with higher CRP values in preterm neonates. A CRP value of >12.0 mg/L was associated with increased risk of meningitis. Interpretation: CRP is not recommended for EOS screening in term neonates, but it may be considered for assessing the risk of EOS in preterm neonates. Interpretation must account for gestational and postnatal age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.