ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Prognostic biomarkers in oral squamous cell carcinoma: current evidence and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) exhibits significant prognostic heterogeneity. This has prompted extensive research into biomarkers that can predict clinical outcomes beyond conventional staging systems. This mini review summarizes findings from the existing literature to provide a comprehensive examination of the prognostic significance of malignancy and progression factors in OSCC, offering insights into future perspectives. There is clear evidence that molecular and protein-based biomarkers, in addition to established clinical and histopathological features, such as lymph node involvement, extranodal spread, and depth of invasion, strongly correlate with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Integrating different gene expression signatures, microRNA (miRNA) profiles, and changes in intracellular signaling pathways enables more differentiated risk stratification. Protein biomarkers such as cyclin D1, trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2), urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and E-cadherin have been shown to provide clinically useful prognostic information. These results underscore the importance of incorporating biomarkers into individualized risk stratification to enhance personalized treatment regimens and outcomes for OSCC patients. Currently, however, established clinical and histopathological parameters, as well as a limited number of validated molecular profiles, remain the most reliable prognostic indicators. While identifying new biomarkers is promising, establishing standardized protocols and implementing careful prospective validation are essential to ensuring their seamless integration into standard clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.