ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Cervical cancer classification using a novel hybrid approach.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metaheuristic optimization of deep CNNs for multi-class diagnosis of cervical cancer and lymphoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recent advancements in the application of artificial intelligence-based approaches for screening, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cervical cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cervical cancer is among the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in women. It is the fourth most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Pap smear tests, a popular and effective medical procedure, enable the early detection and screening of cervical cancer. Expert physicians perform the smear analysis, which is a laborious, time consuming and prone to mistakes. The main objective of our work is to distinguish or classify the healthy and malignant cervical cells using our proposed CASPNet model. Methods: This study proposes a novel technique by combining the concept of feature extraction by multi-head self-attention blocks, cross-stage partial network and feature fusion integration by spatial pyramid pooling fast layer components to identify healthy and cancerous cervical cells. Based on the comprehensive ablation study results, our proposed CASPNet architecture shows optimal performance having superior test accuracy with comparable computational efficiency. Results: The experimental study of our proposed model CASPNet (Contextual Attention and Spatial Pooling Network) has achieved an accuracy of 97.07% in the widely used benchmark SIPAKMED dataset. Conclusion: When compared to CNN models, self-attention blocks of vision transformer models are more accurate in classification tests and are generally better at capturing global contextual information inside an input image. The architecture's CSP blocks are ideal for classification tasks with constrained resources where efficiency and speed are balanced; as a result, they are suitable for local feature extraction. Again, in cervical cells, objects are of varying sizes. Therefore, SPPF records contextual information at different receptive fields and performs multi-scale feature extraction. Hence, we can understand the images more precisely and reliably by incorporating all these benefits in our suggested CASPNet model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.