ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Deep learning models for cervical cancer subtyping using whole slide images.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence-based model for cervical cancer subtyping using whole-slide images (WSI), incorporating both patch-level and WSI-level analyses to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Methods: A total of 438 whole slide images were retrieved from three databases, one public dataset for model training and two independent private datasets for evaluation of generalization. It is comprised of two consecutive stages: a patch-level prediction and a WSI-level prediction. Patch-level predictions were performed using the four convolutional neural networks model, while WSI-level predictions were based on five machine learning algorithms with three different aggregation methods. We compared the models in terms of discrimination (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC)) and calibration. Results: At the patch level, the Inception-v3 model achieved an AUROC of 0.960 (95% confidence interval(95%CI): 0.943, 0.978) in private dataset one and an AUROC of 0.942 (95% CI: 0.929, 0.956) in private dataset one. For WSI-level predictions, the support vector machine algorithm based on Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) features performed the best, with an AUROC of 0.964 (95% CI: 0.916, 0.996) in private dataset one and 0.947 (95% CI: 0.879, 0.996) in private dataset two. The decision curve analysis and calibration curves further validated the clinical potential of the model. Discussion: This study demonstrates the potential of using AI models for cervical cancer subtyping, with strong generalization across multiple datasets and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.