Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426306›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2025

Transformer-based models for ADR detection: cross-drug validation and benchmarking against large language models.

Minjung Kim, Kyoung Eun Kim, Jae-Hee Kwon, Ja-Young Han, Jae Hyun Kim, Myeong Gyu Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Minjung KimCollege of Pharmacy and Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8718-8469
Kyoung Eun KimCollege of Pharmacy and Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Hee KwonCollege of Pharmacy and Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ja-Young HanCollege of Pharmacy and Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hyun KimSchool of Pharmacy and Institute of New Drug Development, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-7135
Myeong Gyu KimCollege of Pharmacy and Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, 52 ewhayeodae-gil, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-7672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are harmful side effects of medications. Social media provides real-time, patient-generated data, though its unstructured format presents challenges. Natural language processing and transfer learning offer promising solutions. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether transformer-based models fine-tuned on a general ADR dataset can effectively classify ADRs from tweets related to glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and to benchmark their performance against state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). Design: This study employed a machine learning approach using transformer-based language models to classify ADRs in social media. Methods: BERT (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers)-base, BERTweet-base, and GPT-2 (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer-2) models were fine-tuned using Sarker and SIDER (Side Effect Resource) datasets for ADR classification. The test dataset comprised 396 tweets mentioning GLP-1 receptor agonists that were categorized as personal experiences. Model performance was primarily evaluated using the F1 score, which was used to select the optimal model. In addition, the fine-tuned transformer models were benchmarked against state-of-the-art LLMs, including ChatGPT 4o, ChatGPT 4o-mini, and Gemini 2.5 Flash. Results: Among 396 tweets, 116 (29.3%) were classified as ADRs and 280 (70.7%) as non-ADRs. Among the transformer-based models, BERTweet-base achieved the highest performance (accuracy: 0.835, F1: 0.729), outperforming both BERT-base (accuracy: 0.826, F1: 0.679) and GPT-2 (accuracy: 0.766, F1: 0.628). Among the LLMs, ChatGPT 4o-mini demonstrated the best results (accuracy: 0.970, F1: 0.948), followed by Gemini 2.5 Flash (accuracy: 0.954, F1: 0.919) and ChatGPT 4o (accuracy: 0.936, F1: 0.895). Overall, LLMs substantially outperformed the fine-tuned transformer-based models. Conclusion: Fine-tuned transformer-based models demonstrated reasonable performance in ADR detection from GLP-1 receptor agonist tweets, with BERTweet-base performing best. However, state-of-the-art LLMs, particularly ChatGPT 4o-mini, substantially outperformed these models, highlighting their potential for pharmacovigilance tasks.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactionBERTGLP-1 receptor agonistsGPTsocial mediatransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41426306
PMCPMC12715130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.