ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluids Improves Pathogen Detection and Antimicrobial Stewardship in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: With the advancement of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), its role in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) has expanded rapidly. LRTIs remain a major global health burden, particularly in critically ill patients where diagnosis is challenging. Routine microbiological testing (RMT), including culture, microscopy, antigen detection, and PCR-are limited by low sensitivity, long turnaround times, and restricted pathogen coverage. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of mNGS in LRTIs, with emphasis on pathogen detection and resistance gene prediction, and compares it with traditional methods to clarify its clinical benefits and limitations. Methods: This retrospective study included 367 hospitalized patients with suspected LRTIs. All patients underwent mNGS testing, which was compared with traditional diagnostic methods. We also used mNGS to explore the pathogen spectrum characteristics in critically ill patients with pneumonia and evaluated its applicability in predicting antimicrobial resistance genes and adjusting antibiotic treatment. Results: For patients diagnosed with LRTIs, mNGS demonstrated superior microbial detection efficacy, particularly for bacteria and fungi, relative to culture (bacteria: 56.58% vs 17.37%, Conclusion: mNGS is an effective tool for diagnosing LRTIs, with significantly higher pathogen detection rates than traditional methods. mNGS also demonstrates high accuracy in predicting antimicrobial resistance, providing crucial support for clinical treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.