ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Risk Factors and Molecular Epidemiology of Infections Among Patients with Intestinal Colonization by Carbapenem-Resistant
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for early prediction of hospital-acquired ESKAPE colonization or infection in very preterm infants using indicators available within 24 hours.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Genomic Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence in ST11 Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: To investigate the molecular epidemiology of intestinal colonization by carbapenem-resistant Methods: From August 2023 to August 2024, we retrospectively enrolled CRE-positive patients identified through active rectal swab screening at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University and monitored them for subsequent infections. Colonizing and infecting isolates were collected and tested for carbapenem-resistance genes, major virulence genes, capsular serotypes, and were subjected to multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Clinical data were integrated and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with secondary infections. Results: Among 8,088 patients who underwent active intestinal CRE screening, the positivity rate was 0.53% (43/8,088). Among patients with colonization, the incidence of secondary infection was 37.2% (16/43). All patients with secondary infections were colonized and infected with Conclusion: Although the intestinal colonization rate of CRE was relatively low, the risk of secondary infection remained substantial. Bacterial genetic traits and host conditions contribute to secondary infections. Establishing surveillance systems based on clinical and molecular epidemiology coupled with intensified screening in high-risk departments may help identify high-risk patients early and enable proactive interventions to reduce CRE-related secondary infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.