Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426278›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association2025

Does Evidence Support an Emotion Regulation Model of Anorexia Nervosa? A Systematic Review of Over a Decade of Research.

Valerie Z Wong, Emily M Koithan, Bolade M Santos, Adanya Johnson, Ann F Haynos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valerie Z WongDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
Emily M KoithanDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Bolade M SantosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Adanya JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Ann F HaynosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Funding

Rule-Based Decision-Making: A Novel Neuroeconomic Mechanism of Anorexia Nervosa Competitive RevisionR01MH126978 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Ann Frances Haynos · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Neural Correlates of Reward and Symptom Expression in Anorexia NervosaK23MH112867 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HAYNOS, ANN FRANCES · 2017 to 2021
$878k
Neuroscience-informed treatment to remotely target reward mechanisms in post-acute anorexia nervosaR34MH129464 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNOS, ANN FRANCES · 2022 to 2024
$692k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112867NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH117606NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126978NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH129464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Over a decade ago, a model was proposed to explain the role of emotion regulation in the development and maintenance of anorexia nervosa (AN). Research on emotion regulation in AN has since rapidly increased, prompting a need to revisit the evidence base regarding whether AN may be considered a disorder of emotion regulation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science on the emotion regulation literature in the years following the proposal of this emotion regulation model. Inclusion criteria were: (a) empirical and quantitative articles in English; (b) human samples; (c) analysis pertaining to AN; and (d) focused on a domain of emotion regulation. The review yielded 134 eligible articles (from a pool of 562 non-duplicate studies) examining emotion regulation constructs in AN, encompassing individual-level emotional and environmental vulnerabilities, use of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and eating disorder behaviors as emotion regulation. Results: Overall, evidence supported the relevance of emotion regulation to the conceptualization of AN. Individuals with AN demonstrated greater individual and environmental vulnerabilities to dysregulation, less adaptive and more maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and greater tendency to engage in eating disorder behaviors to regulate emotions. Findings on emotional reactivity were more mixed. Discussion: Results highlight that continued research on emotion regulation across restrictive eating presentations is needed. Further, treatments directly targeting emotion regulation warrant further investigation. Emotion regulation models continue to hold promise in characterizing core mechanisms of AN.

Indexed as

anorexia nervosaemotion regulationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41426278
PMCPMC12716886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.