ArticleClinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association2025
Does Evidence Support an Emotion Regulation Model of Anorexia Nervosa? A Systematic Review of Over a Decade of Research.
Article in Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A neurodevelopmental model of eating disorder risk in midlife to older adulthood.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- Alexithymia in Anorexia Nervosa, More State Than Trait? A Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Emotion Processing in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa, Recovered Patients and Healthy Controls.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Article
- "It's OK for Me to Cry": Client and Therapist Perspectives on Change Processes in SPEAKS Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa.Journal of clinical psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Over a decade ago, a model was proposed to explain the role of emotion regulation in the development and maintenance of anorexia nervosa (AN). Research on emotion regulation in AN has since rapidly increased, prompting a need to revisit the evidence base regarding whether AN may be considered a disorder of emotion regulation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science on the emotion regulation literature in the years following the proposal of this emotion regulation model. Inclusion criteria were: (a) empirical and quantitative articles in English; (b) human samples; (c) analysis pertaining to AN; and (d) focused on a domain of emotion regulation. The review yielded 134 eligible articles (from a pool of 562 non-duplicate studies) examining emotion regulation constructs in AN, encompassing individual-level emotional and environmental vulnerabilities, use of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and eating disorder behaviors as emotion regulation. Results: Overall, evidence supported the relevance of emotion regulation to the conceptualization of AN. Individuals with AN demonstrated greater individual and environmental vulnerabilities to dysregulation, less adaptive and more maladaptive emotion regulation strategies, and greater tendency to engage in eating disorder behaviors to regulate emotions. Findings on emotional reactivity were more mixed. Discussion: Results highlight that continued research on emotion regulation across restrictive eating presentations is needed. Further, treatments directly targeting emotion regulation warrant further investigation. Emotion regulation models continue to hold promise in characterizing core mechanisms of AN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.