ArticleFrontiers in dementia2025
Exploring intergenerational interactions with tiny social robots: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in dementia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the rapid aging of Canada's population, more older adults are choosing to "aging in place," yet they face challenges of social isolation and health risks. Emerging social robots are considered to have potential in reducing loneliness and promoting intergenerational communication. Objective: This study aimed to explore how two tiny social robots (EMO and AIBI) support intergenerational interactions between older adults and university students, focusing on their emotional value, functionality, and perceived risks or limitations. Methods: We applied the Interpretive Description qualitative methodology. Three focus groups were conducted in community settings, including 13 older adults (aged 51-81 years, including two in their early fifties who were active members of the lab's older adult partner group) and 13 university students (>18 years). The study involved separate introductions to the robots for each group, intergenerational joint sessions, and thematic analysis, following COREQ guidelines. Results: Three key themes emerged: (1) Emotional and companionship value-older adults highlighted improved mood, reduced loneliness, and practical benefits such as reminders; (2) Concerns about limitations and risks-students emphasized technical challenges, sustainability, and risks including over-reliance, communication barriers, and maintenance; (3) Bridging generations-both groups recognized the robots' role in fostering shared engagement and emotional resonance across age groups. Conclusion: Tiny social robots show promise in enhancing older adults' emotional well-being and fostering intergenerational connections. Differences in perspectives underscore the need for co-design approaches that integrate older adults lived experiences with younger people' concerns for usability and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.