Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426219›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2025

Comparative gut microbiota, growth performances, and cytokine indices in broiler chickens with or without litter.

Jin Young Jeong, Seol Hwa Park, Minji Kim, Hwan Ku Kang, Nam-Geon Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jin Young JeongAnimal Nutrition and Physiology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-7036
Seol Hwa ParkAnimal Nutrition and Physiology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7218-8212
Minji KimAnimal Nutrition and Physiology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-1921
Hwan Ku KangAnimal Nutrition and Physiology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4286-3141
Nam-Geon ParkTechnology Service Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Wanju 55365, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6241-2850

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental patterns of the gut microbiota are important for improving chicken health and productivity. However, the influence of litter and litter microbes on cecal microbiota is still unclear. This study aimed to identify broiler cecal microbiota at different ages according to litter usage in cage (without litter) and conventional (with litter) conditions. The cecal contents of the broilers from each group were collected from 1-5 wk. The development and function of the gut microbiota were evaluated using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The final body weight of the chickens was higher in the cage group than that in the conventional group. In particularly, α-diversity was higher at 3 wk than that at 1 wk. The phyla Firmicutes predominated at 3 wk. In contrast, the abundance of Bacteroidetes and fibrinolytic bacteria increased significantly at 1 and 2 wk compared to that at 3 and 5 wk.

Indexed as

BroilerGrowth performanceLitterMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID41426219
PMCPMC12715436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.