Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41426217›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2025

Application of dietary organic acids in laying hens production: a comprehensive review.

Jeseok Lee, Sehyeok Oh, Jung Min Heo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeseok LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-029X
Sehyeok OhDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5529-7532
Jung Min HeoDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The removal of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry diets has driven research into alternative feed additives to optimize production performance in laying hens. Among these alternatives, dietary organic acids (OAs) have gained significant attention due to their antimicrobial properties, ability to modulate intestinal acidity, and role in enhancing nutrient utilization. This review comprehensively examines the effects of OAs supplementation on egg production and quality, blood parameters, intestinal morphology, fecal and intestinal microbiota, and bone health in laying hens. Studies indicate that various OAs supplementation improves egg production and quality. Additionally, OAs contribute to superior eggshell quality by enhancing calcium and protein absorption. The physiological benefits of OAs supplementation include improved intestinal morphology, gut microbiota, and immune and physiological responses. On the other hand, the effectiveness of OAs varies depending on the type of acid, dosage, environmental conditions, and interactions with feed ingredients or additives. This review consolidates current findings to provide practical insights into the application of OAs as a viable alternative to AGPs in commercial laying hen production.

Indexed as

Egg productionEgg qualityLaying henOrganic acidsPhysiological responses

Identifiers

PMID41426217
PMCPMC12715441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.