ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2025
Real-World Data on the Practice of Chemoradiation with Select Cohort Consolidation Chemotherapy in High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers (SOLAR study).
Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Chemoradiation with capecitabine radiotherapy (Cape-RT) has been the standard of care as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) for more than a decade. However, total neoadjuvant therapy has recently emerged as an alternative with the potential to impact survival outcomes; baseline outcomes with Cape-RT in real-world practice in the Indian context are not well known. Material and Methods: Treatment-naive patients with adenocarcinoma on histology and clinical-radiologically diagnosed LARC who received Cape-RT from June 2014 to December 2021 after multidisciplinary discussion were included. Patients received a long course of conventionally fractionated external beam RT (45-50 Gy in 25#) with concurrent oral capecitabine at a dose of 1650 mg/m Results: A total of 1,189 patients with a median age of 49 years (range: 15-95) were identified and included. A significant proportion of patients had high-risk characteristics, such as T3/T4 disease (94%) and node positivity (90%), and they involved circumferential resection margin (CRM) (51%) at baseline. Signet ring and mucinous histology were seen in 13 and 11% of patients. Two hundred and seventy-six patients (23%) required further consolidation chemotherapy (commonly CAPOX [capecitabine-oxaliplatin] or modified FOLFIRINOX [5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-irinotecan-oxaliplatin]) post-Cape-RT prior to attempting surgery due to either persistent CRM positivity, clinical T4 disease, prostate abutment, sphincter involvement (248 patients, 21%), or extensive bulky disease with poor response (12 patients, 1%). Overall, 14 patients (6%) had an interruption in RT and 22 (8%) in chemotherapy. Post-Cape-RT, with or without chemotherapy, 945 patients (79%) underwent TME. Chemotherapy post-TME was administered in 808 patients (78%). With a median follow-up of 54 months (range: 51.2-57.2), the 3- and 5-year EFS for the entire cohort was 73.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.6-75.8) and 64.3% (95% CI: 61.1-67.5), respectively, while the estimated 3- and 5-year OS was 81.3% (95% CI: 78.9-83.7) and 73% (95% CI: 70-76), respectively. On multivariate analysis, the presence of higher T stage ( Conclusion: Real-world data in a less-resourced setting concurs with published prospective and Western real-world data. This provides confidence in implementing consolidation chemotherapy in total neoadjuvant settings in countries with fewer resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.