ArticleKidney international reports2025
Furosemide Stress Test Use in Children at Risk for Acute Kidney Injury.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07718464 (Furosemide Stress Test Implementation and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children at High Risk for Acute Kidney Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Furosemide Stress Test Implementation and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children at High Risk for Acute Kidney Injury: A Hybrid Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventing pediatric acute kidney injury: is it even possible?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Refining AKI Diagnosis: Is There a Return on the Investment?Kidney international reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The furosemide stress test (FST) is used to assess urine flow rate (UFR) after a furosemide bolus. FST predicts severe acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) receipt in adults, with limited data in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. We implemented AKI risk stratification using the renal angina index (RAI) with urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) to guide FST in high-risk children but have not evaluated outcomes. Methods: We combined 2 prospective, observational studies of high AKI risk PICU patients (RAI+: ≥ 8, uNGAL+: ≥ 150 ng/ml). We compared patients who underwent FST (≥ 0.75 mg/kg i.v. furosemide) in the first week versus those who did not, and FST responders (≥ 3 ml/kg/h UFR over 4 hours) versus nonresponders. We examined UFR's predictive performance for new or persistent severe AKI or RRT receipt 2 days later. Results: Of 273 RAI+/uNGAL+ patients, 112 (41%) underwent FST, 60 (54%) were nonresponders. FST patients had higher admission uNGAL and AKI stage. Nonresponders received FST earlier, had higher AKI stage, and higher incidence of new or persistent severe AKI (89% vs. 37%, Conclusion: FST is used inconsistently in high AKI risk children but has prognostic utility for new or persistent severe AKI, including RRT receipt, independent of AKI stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.