ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2026
Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In silico drug discovery and molecular dynamics simulation for targeting neonatal pneumonia and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a major morbidity in preterm infants, necessitating early risk assessment to guide interventions. The present study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model for BPD. A total 120 preterm infants (<32 gestation weeks) admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Infants were retrospectively classified into BPD (n=34) and non-BPD (n=86) groups based on the 2018 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria. Clinical variables, including maternal, neonatal, respiratory and comorbid factors, were assessed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors, which were used to construct a nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve, a calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation was performed via bootstrapping. The results demonstrated that gestational age, birth weight, sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus and intraventricular hemorrhage were independent predictors of BPD. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC=0.918; 95% confidence interval, 0.866-0.971) and good calibration. The nomogram enabled individualized risk estimation, and internal validation confirmed model robustness. In conclusion, the proposed nomogram demonstrated strong discriminative power and clinical applicability for early BPD risk assessment. Future multicenter validation will help extend its generalizability across diverse neonatal populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.