ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2026
Appendiceal mucinous tumour resulting in autoamputation of the appendix: A case report and literature review.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Case of Retained Viable Appendiceal Segment after Perforated Appendicitis.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appendiceal mucinous tumours are rare and can cause various complications, but to the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of cases leading to secondary appendiceal autoamputation. Appendiceal autoamputation is the detachment of part of the appendix without surgery or other invasive interventions and is rarely observed in clinical settings. The present study reports the case of a 68-year-old male patient who was admitted to the hospital due to right lower abdominal pain and was consequently diagnosed with a periappendiceal abscess and underwent conservative anti-inflammatory drug treatment, which successfully improved the condition of the patient. Laparoscopic appendectomy was conducted 3 months later, during which the appendix was found to have partially separated; postoperative pathology revealed an appendiceal mucinous tumour. Following pathological confirmation of the diagnosis, right hemicolectomy, resection of the greater omentum and partial peritoneal resection were performed, followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in accordance with current treatment guidelines. The patient recovered well and was discharged following the operation. Considering the condition of the patient, appendiceal autoamputation was thought to be caused by the appendiceal mucinous tumour. The present case highlights the diagnostic challenges of appendiceal mucinous tumours and underscores the early standardized treatment to improve prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.