ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Seroepidemiological survey of
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to investigate the seroprevalence and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of Anti- Design: Anti-MP-IgG levels were categorized into negative (<24 AU/mL), borderline (≥24 AU/mL and <36 AU/mL), and positive (≥36 AU/mL) groups. The GMCs and prevalence rates were analyzed according to age and gender. Linear regression and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess trends and associations. Results: A total of 526 participants were enrolled in the study. The overall GMC of Anti-MP-IgG was 6.21 AU/mL (95% CI: 5.39-7.15). While there was no significant difference in GMCs between genders ( Conclusions: The seroprevalence and GMCs of Anti-MP-IgG showed a clear age-related increasing trend, indicating age as a significant factor for seropositivity in children aged 0-6 years. Further studies are needed to explore underlying mechanisms and the implications for public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.