Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425881›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Enhancing bronchopulmonary dysplasia prediction in preterm infants using artificial intelligence and multimodal data integration.

Xinkai Zhang, Anping Wang, Rongwei Xu, Dongyun Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinkai Zhang *Qingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Anping Wang *MS in Computer Information Systems, Boston University Metropolitan College, Boston, MA, United States.
Rongwei XuQingdao Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Dongyun LiuDepartment of Pediatrics Medical Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains a prevalent respiratory condition among preterm infants, with its development influenced by a combination of perinatal and postnatal factors. The development of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies has provided new ideas for building BPD prediction models based on multimodal data (such as clinical information, physiological signals, imaging data, biomarkers, and omics data). This article systematically reviewed the research progress of AI in BPD prediction, analyzed representative models and key tools (such as RTI BPD Outcome Estimator), and assessed their performance and limitations in actual clinical settings. It also sorted out the challenges faced by AI models in clinical translation, including data standardization, model interpretability, system integration capabilities, model update mechanisms, and ethical and legal issues. To address the clinical need of "moving from prediction to intervention", this article discussed the PALM translation framework (Predict-Act-Learn-Monitor) organized around key clinical nodes. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen multi-center data sharing, develop privacy protection technologies such as federated learning, and build a design, validation, integration, regulation, and feedback closed-loop management system to help AI models move from risk prediction to precise intervention, ultimately improving the clinical outcomes of children with BPD.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebronchopulmonary dysplasiamachine learningmultimodal datapredictive models

Identifiers

PMID41425881
PMCPMC12711847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.