Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425866›Full record

ReviewGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2025

Physician assistants in outpatient medical practice in Germany - opportunities and challenges.

Stefan Bigge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stefan BiggeTønder, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The German healthcare system faces considerable challenges, particularly due to a shortage of physicians in rural areas and increasing demands from an aging and multimorbid population. Physician assistants (PAs) represent a promising solution to address these challenges. As academically trained healthcare professionals, they take on delegable tasks such as medical histories, routine examinations, documentation, and the care of chronically ill patients. This relieves physicians and allows for more intensive patient care. This paper examines the advantages of integrating physician assistants (PAs) into outpatient care. It shows that PAs can significantly improve the efficiency and quality of care through their work. In particular, PAs play a crucial role in disease management programs (DMPs) for the long-term care of chronically ill patients. Their involvement leads to a reduction in complications and an increase in patient satisfaction. From an economic perspective, PAs optimize the use of resources and help stabilize practices, especially in underserved regions. Despite these potentials, there are significant challenges. There is a lack of uniform national legal regulations clearly defining the competencies and fields of activity of PAs. In addition, there are uncertainties regarding the refinancing of PA services, as well as issues of acceptance among physicians and patients. Competition with existing healthcare professions such as medical assistants (MFAs) or specialized roles like VERAHs necessitates clear delineation of responsibilities. This paper concludes by presenting strategies for the successful integration of physician assistants (PAs). In addition to creating clear legal frameworks and refinancing models, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration is essential. Regular continuing education and the use of digital technologies such as telemedicine can further expand the competencies of PAs. The findings underline that PAs can play a crucial role in ensuring sustainable and patient-centered healthcare - especially in regions affected by physician shortages.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CarePhysician AssistantsChronic DiseaseGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41425866
PMCPMC12715852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.