Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425818›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Case Report: Menstrual cycle-related psychosis in bipolar I disorder, remitting with a combined oral contraceptive.

Shota Hanyu, Kei Yoshimoto, Nobuo Shimizu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shota HanyuDepartment of Psychiatry, Aino Hanazono Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kei YoshimotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Aino Hanazono Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuo ShimizuDepartment of Psychiatry, Aino Hanazono Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menstrual cycle-related psychosis is a rare condition presenting with recurrent affective and psychotic symptoms temporally linked to the menstrual cycle. We report a case with two uncommon features: paradoxical relapse during antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea with hyperprolactinemia, and sustained remission after adjunctive hormonal stabilization using a combined oral contraceptive (drospirenone-ethinyl estradiol). Although phenomenology overlaps with bipolar disorder, the regular monthly periodicity and frequent premenstrual onset indicate a menstrual cycle-related substrate. Rigorous differentiation from bipolar disorder is therefore essential to avoid misclassification and to guide treatment, including consideration of endocrine modulation when this pattern is evident. We describe a 19-year-old Japanese woman with no psychiatric history who presented with acute mania and psychosis necessitating hospitalization. Despite treatment with antipsychotics and mood stabilizers for a bipolar-spectrum illness, she experienced recurrent monthly relapses tightly linked to menstruation, and prophylaxis could not be achieved. During higher-dose antipsychotic therapy, she developed amenorrhea with marked hyperprolactinemia; however, psychotic relapse occurred even during the amenorrheic period. To stabilize ovarian hormones, a combined oral contraceptive was initiated. Premenstrual exacerbations progressively attenuated and then ceased over four months, permitting simplification to the minimum effective antipsychotic regimen. She remained well for an extended period on maintenance psychiatric pharmacotherapy together with the combined oral contraceptive. This case suggests that menstrual cycle-related psychosis may reflect sensitivity to hypoestrogenism: relapse occurred during antipsychotic-induced amenorrhea, whereas adjunctive treatment with a combined oral contraceptive was associated with sustained remission. Adjustments of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers afforded at most transient benefit and did not prevent relapses or attenuate peak severity; sustained improvement occurred only after continuous drospirenone-ethinyl estradiol. For patients who show clear cycle-linked exacerbations despite antipsychotics and mood stabilizers, endocrine stabilization with a combined oral contraceptive may be considered. Operationally, we coded the case as Bipolar I disorder (DSM-5-TR/ICD-11) based on a syndromal manic episode, while phenotypically it showed a menstrual cycle-related (catamenial) pattern-regular cycle-linked, perimenstrual exacerbations with complete inter-episode remission-distinguishing it from non-catamenial bipolar and other psychotic disorders.

Indexed as

amenorrheabipolar disordercase reportcombined oral contraceptivedrospirenone–ethinyl estradiolestrogen withdrawalhyperprolactinemiamenstrual cycle–related psychosis

Identifiers

PMID41425818
PMCPMC12715714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.