Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425780›Full record

ArticleCJC open2025

Training Nonexpert Users in Cardiopulmonary Point-of-Care Ultrasound Using a Virtual Curriculum and a Teleconsultation Model: A Multicentre Study.

Nicholas Grubic, Salwa Nihal, Julia E Herr, Tomislav Jelic, Steven J Montague, Natasha Aleksova, Gillian Nesbitt, Omid Kiamanesh, Daniel J Belliveau, Linden Kolbenson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nicholas GrubicDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Salwa NihalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Julia E HerrDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Tomislav JelicDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Steven J MontagueDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Natasha AleksovaDivision of Cardiology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gillian NesbittDivision of Cardiology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Omid KiamaneshDepartment of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Daniel J BelliveauDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Linden KolbensonDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Zakhar KanyukaDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Sharon L MulvaghDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Barkha SirwaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Amer M JohriDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Disparities in access to postgraduate cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training have limited uptake by nonspecialists in remote care centres. This multicentre pre-post study evaluated the skill improvement of learners after they participated in a longitudinal and virtual POCUS training program. Methods: Nonexpert POCUS users were recruited at urban teaching hospitals and geographically remote hospitals/nursing stations across 4 Canadian provinces. The 3-week educational program consisted of e-learning, independent imaging practice, and point-of-care tele-ultrasound (tele-POCUS) consultations with experts during clinical encounters. Standardized assessments were used to evaluate skill improvement in image acquisition, image quality, and image interpretation for cardiac and lung/pleura POCUS (as measured on a 5-point Likert scale) after program completion and receipt of remotely delivered guidance via tele-POCUS. Results: Among 29 learners, 17 (41% female) completed the training program, of whom 7 practiced in remote hospitals/nursing stations. For cardiac POCUS, pre- and post-training assessments revealed improvements in image acquisition (mean scores: 3.02 to 4.48, Conclusions: Cardiopulmonary POCUS can be taught successfully to learners in diverse geographic settings using a virtual training format and tele-POCUS.

Indexed as

medical educationmulticentrepoint-of-care ultrasoundpre-post studyremote geographical settingstele-medicine

Identifiers

PMID41425780
PMCPMC12713189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.