Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425740›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Scoping Review of the Role of Accommodation and Binocular Coordination in Myopia Onset and Progression.

Bruce John William Evans, Rakhee Shah, Natalia Vlasak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bruce John William EvansOptometry and Visual Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2824-4595
Rakhee ShahOptometry and Visual Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-0936
Natalia VlasakHOYA Vision Care, Amsterdam, 1043 NX, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-4600-6117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The predominant theory, underlying most optical myopia control interventions, is that relative peripheral hyperopic defocus (RPHD) is a cause of myopia progression. However, interventions that reduce RPHD only slow myopia progression on average by ~50%, so other factors are likely to be involved. Objective: To explore the literature on accommodation and binocular coordination as possible factors in myopia development and progression. Methods: PubMed was searched for relevant keywords in September 2025. Non-human and non-English reports were excluded. Results: (1) Concerning myopia onset, the CLEERE study found changes in the interaction between accommodation and convergence (increasing AC/A ratio) from four years before myopia onset. This is thought to indicate compromised accommodation, supported by reduced positive relative accommodation before myopia onset in other longitudinal studies. (2) Regarding myopia progression, the magnitude of accommodative lag is not strongly correlated with rate of myopia progression. The validity of clinical measurements of accommodative lag has been questioned. Tests of eye alignment during near vision show a more convergent posture (esophoria) in some myopes around the time of myopia onset, probably secondary to increased AC/A ratio. If compromised accommodation and/or near esophoria are relevant to myopia progression, prescribing a near addition should be helpful. However, myopia control trials of bifocal and progressive addition lens spectacles show poor efficacy. Despite early indications of greater efficacy in cases with higher accommodative lag and/or near esophoria, poor treatment effects in this sub-group were subsequently found. Nonetheless, some individual cases with symptomatic convergence excess esophoria are likely to benefit from bifocal spectacles for symptomatic relief. Conclusion: Although accommodative dysfunction seems likely to play some role in myopia onset, accommodative and binocular factors are unlikely to be major causal factors in myopia progression. An additive risk factor risk-resilience model is presented and suggestions are made for further research.

Indexed as

AC/A ratioaccommodationaccommodative lagbinocular visionmyopia onsetmyopia progression

Identifiers

PMID41425740
PMCPMC12716086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.