ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Criteria pharmacists use to refer patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The transition from hospital discharge to primary care is a critical period in a patient's healthcare journey. Health system errors occur, due to a breakdown in communication or lack of structured planning which can lead to medication related harm or hospital readmission. At a quaternary referral hospital in Australia, pharmacists refer Internal Medicine patients to a pharmacist-led clinic for post-discharge medication review. While clinical resources exist to guide identification of at-risk patients, it remains unclear if and to what extent, pharmacists incorporate these criteria into their referral. Aim: To determine the criteria and reasons used by pharmacists to refer Internal Medicine patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists who had worked in Internal Medicine and previously referred patients to the post discharge review clinic. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was obtained. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and coded using NVivo®. Themes and subthemes were identified through inductive thematic analysis and finalised via discussion within the research team. Results: Eleven pharmacists were interviewed. Five themes emerged describing referral criteria and reasons: (1) medication criteria including the use of high-risk medications and adjustments; (2) patient criteria including health status, frailty and social aspects of health including carer supports; (3) system pressures including patient flow and time constraints in care delivery; (4) post-discharge care including medication liaison and evaluation of tolerability and; (5) clinical judgement described as "worry" about the patient, highlighting the role of clinical reasoning. Conclusion: Pharmacists used established criteria from clinical resources to identify high-risk patients for referral; however, they also relied on clinical judgement. Referrals aimed to prevent medication related harm and improve communication with patients and healthcare providers. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of clinical judgement to ensure high-risk patients are identified for transition of care services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.