Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425734›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025

Criteria pharmacists use to refer patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic.

Adrienne Kostellar, Michael Barras, Ian Coombes, Andrew Hale, Carla Scuderi, Neil Cottrell, Nazanin Falconer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adrienne KostellarPharmacy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland Health, Cnr Butterfield Street and Bowen Bridge Road, Herston, QLD, Australia 4029.
Michael BarrasSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Queensland, UQ Dutton Park, Level 4, 20 Cornwall Street, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.
Ian CoombesPharmacy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland Health, Cnr Butterfield Street and Bowen Bridge Road, Herston, QLD, Australia 4029.
Andrew HaleDiscipline of Pharmacy, School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Gardens Point Campus, 2 George Greet, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Carla ScuderiPharmacy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland Health, Cnr Butterfield Street and Bowen Bridge Road, Herston, QLD, Australia 4029.
Neil CottrellSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Queensland, UQ Dutton Park, Level 4, 20 Cornwall Street, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.
Nazanin FalconerSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Queensland, UQ Dutton Park, Level 4, 20 Cornwall Street, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The transition from hospital discharge to primary care is a critical period in a patient's healthcare journey. Health system errors occur, due to a breakdown in communication or lack of structured planning which can lead to medication related harm or hospital readmission. At a quaternary referral hospital in Australia, pharmacists refer Internal Medicine patients to a pharmacist-led clinic for post-discharge medication review. While clinical resources exist to guide identification of at-risk patients, it remains unclear if and to what extent, pharmacists incorporate these criteria into their referral. Aim: To determine the criteria and reasons used by pharmacists to refer Internal Medicine patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists who had worked in Internal Medicine and previously referred patients to the post discharge review clinic. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was obtained. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and coded using NVivo®. Themes and subthemes were identified through inductive thematic analysis and finalised via discussion within the research team. Results: Eleven pharmacists were interviewed. Five themes emerged describing referral criteria and reasons: (1) medication criteria including the use of high-risk medications and adjustments; (2) patient criteria including health status, frailty and social aspects of health including carer supports; (3) system pressures including patient flow and time constraints in care delivery; (4) post-discharge care including medication liaison and evaluation of tolerability and; (5) clinical judgement described as "worry" about the patient, highlighting the role of clinical reasoning. Conclusion: Pharmacists used established criteria from clinical resources to identify high-risk patients for referral; however, they also relied on clinical judgement. Referrals aimed to prevent medication related harm and improve communication with patients and healthcare providers. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of clinical judgement to ensure high-risk patients are identified for transition of care services.

Indexed as

Hospital pharmacyMedication related harmPost discharge reviewRisk criteriaRisk factorsTransition of care

Identifiers

PMID41425734
PMCPMC12712588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.