ArticleCureus2025
Medication Based Recovery in Opioid Use Disorder: A Clinical and Epistemic Imperative.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medication‑based recovery (MBR) is based on a recent proposal by leading addiction scientists, which rejects abstinence‑only definitions that drive unsafe practices such as forced tapering or discharge. Instead, it reframes opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment by recognizing that recovery can be achieved and sustained while patients remain on medication for OUD (MOUD). MBR is structured around a staged care pathway of protection, remission, and recovery, prioritizing immediate harm reduction, sustained clinical engagement, and measurable improvements in health and social functioning. It endorses ongoing MOUD combined with validated monitoring, behavioral interventions, and social supports to reduce overdose, infectious complications, and other harms. Effective implementation of MBR requires an aligned policy and payment reforms to support measurement‑based practice, coordinated services and integrated delivery, licensing and credentialing changes to protect clinicians who provide evidence‑based MOUD, and workforce development to expand prescribers and embed addiction expertise in primary care and telehealth. MBR also requires public and family education to reduce stigma and to reframe expectations about what constitutes meaningful recovery. Success should be measured by retention on MOUD and reductions in overdose risk during the protection phase, decreases in use and symptom severity during remission, and gains in housing, employment, and social functioning during recovery. Framed as both a clinical and an epistemic imperative, MBR affirms the legitimacy of evidence‑based care and counters epistemic exclusion that marginalizes patients and clinicians who rely on MOUD. Widespread adoption of MBR holds the promise of reducing mortality, improving health, and expanding equitable recovery opportunities for patients and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.