Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425675›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Water Conservation in Orthopaedic Surgical Scrubbing: A Comparative Analysis of Water Consumption in Standard and Modified Surgical Scrubbing Techniques.

Aaisha Shahbaz, Yash Dinesh, Kamen S Dosanjh, Sohail Muzammil, Fahad Imami, Rohma Shahbaz, Mohamed Messwi, Deepa Bose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aaisha ShahbazTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Yash DineshTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Kamen S DosanjhTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Sohail MuzammilOrthopaedic Surgery, Doctors Hospital and Medical Center, Lahore, PAK.
Fahad ImamiGeneral Surgery, Pakistan Air Force Hospitals, Islamabad, PAK.
Rohma ShahbazGeneral Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Multan, Multan, PAK.
Mohamed MesswiTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Deepa BoseTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Surgical hand scrubbing plays a vital role in preventing surgical site infections. The current guidelines recommend a scrub that lasts between two and five minutes. This, however, poses a challenge where the traditional continuous flow scrub method consumes around 20 litres of water. With water scarcity quickly becoming a global issue, this highlights the importance of finding more efficient scrubbing techniques. Objective A comparison of the duration of scrubbing and water consumed between the standard continuous flow technique and a modified tap on/off technique, to determine if significant water savings can be achieved without compromising scrub quality. Methods This study was carried out in the trauma and orthopaedic department at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Thirty-four healthcare professionals participated by performing both standard and modified scrub techniques. To measure the amount of water, a 25-litre container along with a weighing method was used. Stopwatches were used to track the scrub duration and the time the tap was actively running. Results The modified scrubbing technique led to reduced water use, as average staff members used 5.6 ± 1.78 litres (mean ± SD). In the standard technique, the median water use was 16.2 L (interquartile range (IQR) 6.15). The mean saving of 11.34 ± 5.57 litres (mean ± SD) was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Scrub times were slightly longer with the modified technique, showing a mean increase of 14.96 ± 44.30 seconds (mean ± SD), but this did not reach a statistically significant difference. Conclusion The modified scrubbing method delivers significant water savings without compromising the duration of the process. This makes it a practical and sustainable option, while also supporting the NHS's commitment to the environment.

Indexed as

healthcare sustainabilityorthopaedic surgerysurgical scrubwater consumptionwater reduction

Identifiers

PMID41425675
PMCPMC12712734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.