ArticleCureus2025
Water Conservation in Orthopaedic Surgical Scrubbing: A Comparative Analysis of Water Consumption in Standard and Modified Surgical Scrubbing Techniques.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Surgical hand scrubbing plays a vital role in preventing surgical site infections. The current guidelines recommend a scrub that lasts between two and five minutes. This, however, poses a challenge where the traditional continuous flow scrub method consumes around 20 litres of water. With water scarcity quickly becoming a global issue, this highlights the importance of finding more efficient scrubbing techniques. Objective A comparison of the duration of scrubbing and water consumed between the standard continuous flow technique and a modified tap on/off technique, to determine if significant water savings can be achieved without compromising scrub quality. Methods This study was carried out in the trauma and orthopaedic department at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Thirty-four healthcare professionals participated by performing both standard and modified scrub techniques. To measure the amount of water, a 25-litre container along with a weighing method was used. Stopwatches were used to track the scrub duration and the time the tap was actively running. Results The modified scrubbing technique led to reduced water use, as average staff members used 5.6 ± 1.78 litres (mean ± SD). In the standard technique, the median water use was 16.2 L (interquartile range (IQR) 6.15). The mean saving of 11.34 ± 5.57 litres (mean ± SD) was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Scrub times were slightly longer with the modified technique, showing a mean increase of 14.96 ± 44.30 seconds (mean ± SD), but this did not reach a statistically significant difference. Conclusion The modified scrubbing method delivers significant water savings without compromising the duration of the process. This makes it a practical and sustainable option, while also supporting the NHS's commitment to the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.