Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41425638›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Medicaid's role in critical care after Medicaid expansion: evidence from Virginia.

Sarah J Marks, Kristina E Rudd, Chethan Bachireddy, Julie M Donohue, Derek C Angus, Theodore J Iwashyna, Andrew J Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah J MarksDepartment of Health Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3468-3474
Kristina E RuddDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-8401
Chethan BachireddyDepartment of Health Systems and Population HealthSciences, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77204, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-5769
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
Derek C AngusDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7026-5181
Theodore J IwashynaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4226-9310
Andrew J BarnesDepartment of Health Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, United States.

Funding

Understanding how health determinants shape recovery after critical illness among Virginia Medicaid patientsF30MD019536 · NIMHD · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Sarah Julia Marks · 2024 to 2026
$132k
NIMHD NIH HHS F30 MD019536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medicaid provides access to care for low-income patients facing life-threatening illnesses who are cared for in intensive care units (ICUs). Despite the growth of Medicaid coverage with the Affordable Care Act, little is known about Medicaid's role in critical care for the Medicaid Expansion population, adults ages 19-64. Methods: Using hospital discharge data from Virginia, we examined payer composition between 2016 and 2023 and analyzed 2023 demographic and clinical data for adults ages 19-64. Results: Medicaid's share of ICU stays more than doubled from 2016 (14.1%) to 2023 (31.8%). While only 25.6% of Medicaid hospitalizations involved ICU care, these stays account disproportionately for charges (51.7%), hospital days (36.9%), and readmissions (32.3%). Common reasons for admission include potentially preventable conditions: sepsis, diabetes, heart failure, and alcohol use. Medicaid patients, despite being younger than their commercially insured counterparts, have more comorbidities (4+ comorbidities: 49.9% vs 38.9%) and are more likely to be readmitted in adjusted models (29.7% [95% Confidence Interval: 29.1-30.4] vs 24.3% [95% Confidence Interval: 23.6%-25.1%]). Conclusions: This work demonstrates the crucial role of Medicaid as a payer for seriously ill adults and the need for increased attention by Medicaid programs to ICU patients before, during, and after hospitalization.

Indexed as

Affordable Care Actcritical carehospital readmissionsintensive care unitMedicaidMedicaid expansionutilization

Identifiers

PMID41425638
PMCPMC12715180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.