ArticleApplied network science2025
Tunable network properties with Hamill and Gilbert's Social Circles generator.
Article in Applied network science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hamill and Gilbert (J Artif Soc Soc Simul 12, 1-23, 2009) developed the Social Circles algorithm to generate synthetic networks that have properties of real social networks such as skewed degree distribution, positive clustering coefficient, degree assortativity and short path lengths. To assess the viability of Social Circles as a general network generator, we systematically examine the relationship between algorithm parameters and a broader range of structural properties of the generated networks. We varied social reaches for agents, distribution of social reaches in the population, and node density. We find that edge density and centrality measures can be controlled in a predictable way: longer reaches are associated with denser networks, shorter paths, lower degree assortativity (with some exceptions), and smaller variation in centrality measures. However, these network properties changed together and there is limited capacity to control properties separately. Further, clustering coefficient is insensitive to algorithm inputs. Thus, it cannot be used as a general network generator as it stands. If these properties are important, Social Circles could be used to generate starting networks with reasonable social structure, but further steps would be required to refine the structural properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.