ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Learning Curve for Aortic Root Replacement.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to assess the number of root procedures performed for a newly graduated surgeon to overcome the learning curve. Methods: An institutional database was used to obtain details for patients undergoing root surgery during a 10-year period for a newly graduated surgeon. To assess learning curve, strucchange R package (engineering method to objectively identify structural changes in data) was used to analyze operative efficiency. A cumulative sum failure analysis curve was plotted to indicate the magnitude and direction of changes in efficiency for this single surgeon. A composite of adverse outcome was assessed across learning curve phases. Results: Strucchange identified 3 segments to the learning curve. These occurred at 38 (95% CI, 25-54) and 148 (95% CI, 135-152) cases. Based on this, there were 3 segments to the learning curve: after the first 25 to 50 cases, 50 to 150 cases, and then 150 cases onward. The composite of adverse outcome was compared across the phases of the learning curve. In phase 1, 44.0% experienced the outcome, which was reduced to 20.0% in phase 2 and 21.1% in phase 3 ( Conclusions: There appear to be 3 segments of the learning curve for the new surgeon when performing root replacement. The first occurs after around 25 to 50 cases, after which there is a rapid decline in operative time and complications. The second phase occurs between cases 50 and 150, during which advanced proficiency is developed. Aortic fellowship programs should aim to graduate fellows with at least 50 root procedures as first operator.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.