ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Concomitant Tricuspid Annuloplasty During Mitral Surgery: Becoming an Unpopular Practice?
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) during surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation remains debated. A recent Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network trial demonstrated a reduction in tricuspid regurgitation with concomitant TA, with no mortality or quality of life benefit and a significantly higher risk of permanent pacemaker placement. We sought to quantify the rate of TA in eligible patients after publication of these trial results. Methods: Using a regional collaborative, we identified all patients between 2017 and 2023 with degenerative mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement. We included only those patients with moderate tricuspid regurgitation. Those with endocarditis, primary tricuspid regurgitation, severe tricuspid regurgitation, or an undocumented degree of tricuspid regurgitation were excluded. Our time event was the trial publication date. A 1-month washout period before and after the time of publication was used to account for change in surgeon practice. Results: We identified 204 patients who met inclusion criteria, with 57 patients (27.9%) undergoing surgery in the posttrial period. The rate of tricuspid repair in the pretrial group was 45.6% compared with 26.3% in the posttrial group ( Conclusions: In a comparative group of patients with moderate tricuspid regurgitation undergoing mitral valve surgery, there was a significant decrease in concomitant tricuspid valve interventions after the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network trial publication.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.